Disclaimer: I’ve only attempted reading one Dean Koontz novel. I could be wrong about him. I’ll try again someday.
I’ve read 163 pages (32%) of Dean Koontz’s “Shadow Fires”. And that’s all I’m going to read. The only reason I got that far was because I had a suspicion about “the monster” and wanted to see if I was right. I was.
The reason I’m stopping, despite being so far in, is that he doesn’t trust me. Every time a character reacts to the action of the unfolding story, Dean feels it necessary to explain what the character is feeling and thinking. Are these underdeveloped characters? No at all. They have secrets, but each of the main characters are explained early on, in great detail.
The only possible explanation for these unnecessary details is that either Dean believes I may not be human, or that he is writing for stupid people. Every single time he invokes a thought or a feeling with his words, he uses a hundred more to make sure I got it. I got it. I’m am human. Maybe it’s self-deprecation that he assumes everyone who reads his work is a dullard.
So I put it down and have moved on to yet another novel written by Stephen King. The first 3 pages of “The Regulators” says more than the first 163 pages of “Shadow Fires”. And I don’t even think I got everything King was saying.








